Working to replace belief with knowledge in democratic policy making.

The Campaign

It is my intention to apply my newly definitive knowledge/belief differentiation to show that commentaries in the media on government policies are never more than contributions supportive of one side or the other, whether the topic be on climate change, alternate energy sources, NHS, crime control, educational practice, human relations, or whatever; that all such commentaries are thus merely contributions to on-going debates of opinion/counter-opinion; that such debate is merely the debate of belief/ counter-belief, respectively supported by partially selected facts/counter-facts, evidence/counter-evidence and news/false-news, no set of which is debate-terminating conclusive knowledge; that the only way to reach a debate-terminating conclusion is to replace belief/counter-belief with definitive knowledge already available, or to agree that such knowledge is as yet unavailable, and needs to be acquired by the reality-evaluation of such beliefs and/or counter-beliefs to positive or negative conclusive knowledge in compliance with the definitive knowledge/belief differentiation which is the foundation of my Campaign for Knowledge to Replace Belief.